Solidarity for Young Workers in the Wake of Corona

Solidarity for Young Workers in the Wake of Corona

Solidarity for Young Workers in the Wake of Corona

Wednesday, April, 22, 2020 By Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

Solidarity for Young Workers in the Wake of Corona

Wednesday, April, 22, 2020 By Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

267 million young people are already excluded from employment, education, and training (NEET status), we can only foresee that, similarly to the 2008 economic crisis, young people will be forced into inactivity. This moment of unemployment and discouragement can threaten the long-term prospects of an individual’s career because of that person’s lack of access to professional and social skills, as well as valuable on-the-job experience.

Described as being most certainly ‘unprecedented,’ the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the vulnerabilities in every sector of life, especially that of the workforce. These times require a great force of sustainability and commitment to both our local and global communities. In hoping to move forward towards a global conversation, it is time to be aware and conscious of how deeply the coronavirus has touched the world. Affecting every single working person around the world (3.3 billion workers), we need to consider who amongst this population needs the most focus and assistance. COVID-19 has exposed our weaknesses and, thus, caused a decline in employment, working conditions, earnings and incomes, contractual arrangements, sales and profits, numbers of employees, business survival, business solvency, and voice and representation. Amongst the population of workers, young workers are widely the most significantly affected. Since youth labor market outcomes are highly sensitive to the business cycle, the impact of the pandemic will be worse for younger workers. We can expect to notice an increase in unemployment and poverty for those situated in the demographic of young workers.

Being strongly responsive to decreases in GDP, economic shocks, and typically burdened by the “first out” approach, young people are not in the best position to survive this storm. As working hours decline by 6.7%, the global community realizes that young workers and, especially, young entrepreneurs may not have the experience nor strategies to cope with this scale of a crisis. Currently, three-fourths of workers are in some sort of informal employment position, which makes them ‘highly susceptible to aggregate demand shocks, lockdown, and contagion.’ With our current lack of social protection, in addition to limited access to healthcare services and income replacement during periods of illness, this pandemic will most certainly affect the typical activities of informal workers, specifically younger workers.

Before the coronavirus, young people were overrepresented in wholesale and retail, trade and accommodation, and food services sectors. These being the most heavily impacted sectors, young people can only expect that these changes will turn into lay-offs and lower earnings. The current situation provides limited opportunities for those young workers in the informal economy, while additionally, creating awkward conditions for young people outside the workforce.

As the combined population works to shift into new paradigms of being and doing, organizations around the world are creating frameworks to advocate and stimulate for survival and eventual advancement. To promote ‘job-rich inclusive growth,’ we must focus on ‘stimulating the economy and employment; supporting enterprises, jobs and incomes; protecting workers in the workplace; all while relying on the exchange of social dialogue to provide solutions’ (ILO). With the goal being to promote enterprises, employment, and incomes, nations must intervene on the levels of supply, intermediation, and demand. Specifically, it is necessary to provide social protection for all, to be open to different types of financial and non-financial support, to protect formal jobs, and to support and secure the lives and livelihoods of those working in the informal economy. In the Small Matters study, conducted by the International Labour Organization (ILO), it was found that seven out of ten available employment opportunities are created by small to mid-sized enterprises (SMEs). Therefore, we need to uphold the needs of these businesses so that they might support their community’s employment needs.

As Susana Puerto, coordinator for the Global Initiative on Decent Jobs for Youth from the ILO, perfectly articulated, we must commit to each other in a time such as this. Governments and enterprises which work to be informed by their citizens’ and employees’ needs will succeed in promoting humane work opportunities for all.

The True Essence of an Entrepreneurial Educator

The True Essence of an Entrepreneurial Educator

The True Essence of an Entrepreneurial Educator

Monday, April, 20, 2020 By: Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy and Dr. Alex DeNoble

The True Essence of an Entrepreneurial Educator

Monday, April, 20, 2020 By: Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy and Dr. Alex DeNoble

From Sudden Crisis to Prepared Planning:

This moment of connected isolation has changed everyone’s plans from cancellations to postponements. We have re-envisioned and amended our preconceived ideas about learning, teaching, working, and producing. It has only been through acceptance of our new normal that we have found the encouragement and creativity necessary to critically reflect, in a way that allows us to reimagine our current capacities, capabilities, and preconceived pedagogies. In doing so, our new normal will hopefully become something more than what must be, and it instead transforms into something better, an environment that cares and supports all its actors.

As we recognize the absoluteness of our current situation, there has never been a better time to tease apart our current system, to identify our strengths, and to eventually rebuild our new, more reliable, and more expansive community. In thinking about entrepreneurship and innovation during this changing time, educators, researchers, practitioners, and learners must decide what needs to be amended in our current pedagogies of entrepreneurship that will eventually allow us to create more prepared entrepreneurs appropriately. That is those ready to learn and adapt to the world’s pressing and ever-changing challenges. Thinking about entrepreneurship as a contact sport, the game starts with engagement, a general desire to play; however, after, students need to understand the language, tools, concepts, and theories that underlie the rules of the game. We can start to demonstrate, then, that it takes more than just an entrepreneurial mindset. The skills to act on our ideas and passions, in addition to the guidance to respond appropriately to the demands of creation and innovation are essential.

In clarifying the true essence of an entrepreneurial educator, the focus moves from the possibility of teaching someone to be an entrepreneur if the entrepreneur is open to learning. The idea is that educators are not creating a passion for their students, but instead, they are fueling it and guiding it. Educators are looking for students who have the desire, the “fire in their belly,” to help them develop their skill sets, professional networks, and frameworks to think about complex entrepreneurial matters as mentioned by Professor Alex DeNoble from San Diego State University. As the entrepreneurial path includes many assumptions and, often, very little knowledge supporting these expectations and beliefs, it is only those who behold an entrepreneurial spirit that will survive the unraveling of their assumptions. This is the determining point of an entrepreneur, one that makes disappointments into their ending or those who transform these missteps into their reassessment and continue with a new lense.

In looking at the California Entrepreneurship Educators Conference, a local conference that, after its creation, attracted quite an international community, one understands the embodiment of entrepreneurial spirit. Initially, this conference would be canceled because of the travel limitations put in place due to the current pandemic. However, by recognizing the strengths that this crisis has created, for example, the public’s newly-found, general comfort in engaging online, we can reimagine a conference that is not only transmitted online, but that is enhanced upon. After a year of preparation, the solution is not to postpone or cancel the conference, but to host a better conference online. Therefore, the essential topics and the constant learning that takes place during this conference transforms with its platform.

In setting limits on entrepreneurs, we are only giving them a more significant opportunity to create and innovate. As Dr. Alex DeNoble, Professor at San Diego State University, and Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy, Deputy Chair of the Department of Management at the George Washington University, converse, they challenge each other to further develop upon their initial responses. As the two professors, both active in their local and global communities’ work for entrepreneurial studies and right, describe their questions, they end the discussion at a crossroad, one at which they are excited about the future while remaining informed by the past. In hopes of amplifying the academic perspective, they promote the entrepreneurial spirit, which seeks to thrive in the face of limitation. By recognizing the strengths of their communities and others, this conversation acted only as a predecessor to the conversations that occurred at the 2020 California Entrepreneurship Educator Conference.

Exiting a Business

Exiting a Business

Exiting a Business

Monday, April, 20, 2020

Exiting a Business

Monday, April, 20, 2020

Reasons for ending involvement in a business

In any dynamic entrepreneurial society it is inevitable, in order to promote and benefit from entrepreneurship, that some of these ventures will fail. Few or no business exits may therefore indicate low startup activity. Moreover, perceptions about starting a business may also be directly related to how easy it is seen to be to end a business. If ending a business is expensive and difficult, or even socially or culturally unacceptable, this may act as a strong barrier to starting a business in the first place.

It was noted in Chapter 2 that entrepreneurs contribute to or even lead structural change in an economy, since their new ventures reflect changing tastes, disruptions, new technologies and processes as new sectors are born and grow. The converse of this is the closure of businesses that no longer produce or provide what people are prepared to buy, or in the way that they want to buy it. When this happens, startups and closures become important components in the process of structural change, which (eventually) improves productivity and living standards, by releasing resources from the production of goods and services that no longer have a market in favour of those that do. Entrepreneurs may then apply this experience to a new venture or new employment opportunities, while continuing as a stakeholder in entrepreneurship — if not as entrepreneurs then perhaps as advisors, investors or customers. (Read more…).

Frugal Innovation

Frugal Innovation

Frugal Innovation

Tuesday, April 14, 2020, By Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

Frugal Innovation

Tuesday, April 14, 2020, By Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

When Frugal Innovation Meets Reverse Engineering

We are beginning with a simple yet intrinsically complex question: how can we innovate with limited resources in a way that will create products and services that are accessible to all? In taking a step back, we might see the solution more easily; that being, we must do better with less. In introducing the concept of frugal innovation, we can begin to think about how SMEs can escape the volatility of crisis and change, and eventually start finding solutions that uplift the values of ingenuity, empathy, and resilience.

The inspiration for this concept came from the personal experience of Mr. Navi Radjou in his book Frugal Innovation that he shared with me in a very enlightening webinar (link below), and how he experienced and learned about scarcity. Confrontation with limitations, such as that of water, led to an understanding of the real importance and preciousness of resources. In a mission to use less of these scarcities, we can become suddenly and creatively emancipated. When we remember that having less does not equal being less, we can transition from a world of limits to one of the innovative opportunities.

Exemplifying the boundless ends of frugal innovation, we can look to China, who, ten years ago, shifted to telemedicine, initially to care for its citizens who had limited access to medical care. In doing this, China’s medical professionals were able to adapt to the needs of their consumers, or patients, including a population of nearly 500 million senior citizens. In shifting to a business model that meets customers where they are, remote doctors were able to consult patients in villages and create treatment plans for their patients’ chronic diseases, with which community workers could assist, thus building local and global solidarity. Demonstrating the power of a collective, communal level for frugal innovation, China was able to capitalize on this preset system, in the wake of diagnosing and treating patients infected with COVID-19. This keen example demonstrates how those who work to promote the inclusion and participation of their entire community can stand stronger and adapt more smoothly during times of crisis.

Frugal innovation is not just a method, nor a set of principles, but more so a metaparadigm, which is an entirely new way of thinking about innovation and value creation. Returning to our main point of doing better with less, we are directed to two essential truths: it is necessary to focus on creating more value, in addition to minimizing scarce resources and maximizing the intangible ones. Our question, then, develops to how can we optimize the delivery of value, while using all the available tangible and intangible resources.

There stand six key principles of frugal innovation. Those being to engage and iterate, to flex your existing resources, to co-create regenerative solutions, to shape customer behavior, to co-create value with ‘prosumers,’ and to hyper-collaborate with atypical partners. In looking more closely at three of these principles, we can more definitively comprehend the importance of value-based businesses in the realm of SMEs.

When flexing existing resources, we are challenged to step outside of the scarcity mindset in which we so often find ourselves during moments of crisis. Instead, by celebrating and valorizing what we already have, we can leverage our existing resources immediately to then convert that into what our business might need. By using what we already have, we ask ‘why not’ instead of just ‘why.’ Co-creating regenerative solutions is another essential part of frugal innovation. With the current climate crisis becoming ever more pressing, we need to decide if it is sustainability or regeneration that is more important to us. Sustaining our current business models, supply chains, and political systems will only lead us to the same place of deficit in which we currently sit. However, in regenerating, we can imagine a shift from a linear to a circular economy, one which includes a continuation of interactions between usage, the end-use, materials, and production distribution. This allows us to act on our social, ecological, and economic priorities all at once, instead of choosing only one value to the target. Lastly, hyper-collaborate with atypical partners encourages us to think outside our predetermined box to find new and more significant solutions. By substituting a scarcity of resources for resource sharing, we can exemplify the radical nature of frugal innovation. If this B2B (Business to Business) sharing economies and marketplaces could spread all over the world, we would be able to increase transparency, resource utilization, all while focusing on multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This also holds the potential to create partnerships that allow the expertise of SMEs to work with the backing of big companies to respond to the world’s most pressing issues.

In this time of crisis, the most crucial solution will be found when we can move away from a place of fear, which clouds our ability to see from other perspectives and shift to a place of calmness and diversity. By calming the limbic system, we will be able to see more clearly the answers found within and in front of us. Reaching out to those who are different from us during moments of panic, can bring us different perspectives, which will break our own routine mistakes. Being aware of our inherent need to do something familiar can signal us that this is a moment to try something radically different. On the other side of stress and fear, we can find ourselves in a place to be entirely open to anything and everything at the moment. The goal is to stop thinking about after COVID and think about right now. It is time to begin developing frugally, and maybe later, we will be able to bolden the frugal strategy made possible only by this crisis.

In his closing remarks, Navi Radjou reminds us that “the world is one family,” meaning that it is only through the positive reinforcement of this family that we can truly bring about the real and necessary changes needed to survive and eventually succeed in a moment such as this.

Welcome back, Frugal Innovation.

Reference video: Meet the Author: Frugal Innovation: How SMEs Can Do Better With Less.

Informal Investment

Informal Investment

Informal Investment

Monday, April 16, 2020. Written By: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)

Informal Investment

Monday, April 16, 2020. Written By: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)

The act of starting a new business requires resources, including access to finance.

Many news sources, particularly in developed economies, characterize those starting new businesses as building smartphone applications using high technology in open-plan offices, presenting pitches to venture capitalists, in a world of high finance and initial public offerings. In practice, new businesses are more likely to be started with the entrepreneur’s savings, credit cards or overdrafts, or with loans from family and friends. Informal investment is when an individual provides funds for a new business started by someone else, and is typically from family, or friends and other acquaintances.

In its 2019 Adult Population Survey (APS), GEM asks individuals if they have invested in a new business started by someone else, and if so how much they invested, and what is the relationship to that person. Figure 6.1 shows the proportion of adults in each economy that, in 2019, have both invested in someone else’s new business at any time in the past three years and stated how much they provided.

The proportion of adults investing in someone else’s new business is less than 2% in 10 of the 50 economies, but more than 5% in 17 of those 50. Rates of informal investment are highest in Latin America & Caribbean (more than two in 10 in Chile; more than one in 10 adults in Guatemala), in the Middle East & Africa (around one in 10 or more in Qatar, Oman and Saudi Arabia), and in Europe (just under one in 10 in Switzerland). These figures show Chile as a dynamic entrepreneurial economy, both in the process of starting businesses (almost four in 10 adults), and in investing in other people’s enterprises (two in 10 adults) (READ MORE…).

Download Full ICSB Gazette.

Defending Science in a Time of Fear and Uncertainty

Defending Science in a Time of Fear and Uncertainty

Defending Science in a Time of Fear and Uncertainty

Monday, April 12, 2020. By Patrice A. Harris, MD, MA, President, American Medical Association

Defending Science in a Time of Fear and Uncertainty

Monday, April 12, 2020. By Patrice A. Harris, MD, MA, President, American Medical Association

COVID-19 represents a health challenge our world has not faced for generations.

This enormous threat has touched every state and virtually every community, and it has brought out the best in our physicians, nurses, medical staff, public health officials and scientists who are working heroically under intense pressure.

In these extraordinary times, however, their best efforts are hampered by the spread of misinformation and half-truths online, across social media, and in the media at-large. We’re living in a time where evidence and facts have increasingly become viewed with skepticism. The result is a growing mistrust in American institutions, in science, and in the counsel of leading experts whose lives are dedicated to the pursuit of evidence and reason.

In a virtual address hosted by the National Press Club, I made an appeal for science in slowing the spread of misinformation and in helping turn the tide against COVID-19.

The public is already making significant sacrifices by staying at home and avoiding large gatherings. But the nations need much more from our leaders. And we need to be able to trust that our institutions are keeping science at the fore of their decision-making.

With that in mind:

  • The AMA calls on all elected officials to affirm science, evidence and fact in their words and actions.
  • We call on media to be vigilant in communicating factual information from credible sources and to challenge those who chose to trade in misinformation.
  • We call on tech platforms to advance evidence-based information from credible sources and reduce the spread of misinformation.
  • We call on our government’s scientific institutions, to be led by experts who are protected from political influence.
  • We call for an environment in which physicians, scientists and other experts are free to communicate evidence-based, factual information.
  • We call for determinations about the safety and efficacy of drugs to be made by scientists and researchers, based on data. Treatment decisions should be made via a shared decision-making process between a patient and physician without intrusion by any third-party, government or otherwise.
  • We call for the robust collection of data, including data segmented by race and ethnicity, to make sure we have a thorough understanding of the pandemic’s impact on every community.

 

Looking back to look ahead

America has faced—and overcome—enormous public health challenges before. We greatly reduced smoking, discovered treatments for HIV/AIDS, and eradicated polio and other vaccine-preventable diseases. These were challenges that required changes in thinking, policy, and behavior. Scientists and physicians found solutions by using facts and evidence, and widespread change was enacted because policy makers and the public believed them.

That’s why we know that stay-at-home orders and physical distancing are effective in combatting a flu pandemic.

The last time we experienced a pandemic on this scale was a century ago, when an influenza swept across our country and the world. Back then, different cities in the U.S. took different approaches. And evidence shows that cities that quickly instituted physical distancing restrictions—shutting businesses and schools for short periods of time – had the lowest death rates.

Take Philadelphia and St. Louis as examples. The first case of influenza was recorded in Philadelphia on September 17, 1918. Days later, they held a war-bonds parade attended by 200,000 people. Within two weeks, over 20,000 people had contracted the flu.

St. Louis was a different story. Monitoring the way that the flu had impacted cities on the East Coast, public officials acted quickly. Just a couple days after their first reported case, they shut the city down. And as a result, they experienced half the death rate that Philadelphia did.

The science and evidence tells us that physical distancing measures work and must not be relaxed prematurely. We are encouraged by those federal and state leaders who are willing to keep physical distancing restrictions in place until the evidence suggests it is safe to return to normal. And we continue to call for governors who have not yet implemented physical distancing in their states to do so—immediately.

 

Danger of misinformation

Some have referred to this pandemic as a war. We must make sure this is not a war on science. We all want to find a solution to this pandemic as quickly as possible, but doing it correctly requires patience and adherence to the core principles and knowledge we’ve relied on in the past.

That’s why we all have a responsibility to seek out, and share, information only from credible sources.

And to make sure we have a thorough understanding of the pandemic’s impact on every community, we need a robust effort to collect data segmented by race and ethnicity.

There are so many things we don’t yet know about this pandemic, but there is something that we do. It is science that will bring about proven, effective treatments for COVID-19 and create a vaccine. It is science that will allow us to reduce or delay infections and save lives.

Every person in this nation is a partner to physicians in fighting this virus. And we all have a responsibility to do our part.

It’s important to remember that while we may at times feel hopeless and overwhelmed in the face of a pandemic, we are not powerless. And we have science and evidence on our side.

Go to American Medical Association.

The Need for Inclusive Entrepreneurship

The Need for Inclusive Entrepreneurship

The Need for Inclusive Entrepreneurship

Saturday, April, 11, 2020 by Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

The Need for Inclusive Entrepreneurship

Saturday, April, 11, 2020 by Dr. Ayman El Tarabishy

During this near society reversal set in place by the COVID-19 pandemic, we have the rare opportunity to realign ourselves with what is essential. Currently, American society is an idea often defined by innovation, efficiency, exchange. In times like this, we need an evolution of the ideas that structure our world. So the question for us centers on how we can create an America which adds care, kindness, and humanity to the mix.

Following an interesting conversation with my seat neighbor on a flight home about three months ago, I was left captivated. After rotating through the normal flow of flight conversation, the woman next to me spoke more deeply about her struggles accessing affordable technology that could help her exist in a world made exclusively for the typically-abled. This woman was recently disabled after a horse-back riding accident. A strikingly grave incident that changed her body and her reality forever. This woman shared her struggles, and our conversation ended with my attempt to optimistically add that potential new technologies could assist her in maneuvering through a world that was made without her in mind.

If only this conversation had been a couple of weeks later, I might have more wisely placed my words. This woman’s abilities put her in the “high-risk” category on a typical day. Now add a pandemic. Every public service announcement seems to be repeating the need for social distancing and frequent hand washing. However, how is this woman supposed to social distance when she needs someone to help her out of bed? The simple answer is that she can not.

This one example makes me wonder who else our system has once again forgotten. We know to protect the elderly, those who are differently-abled, and those who are immunocompromised. However, we have forgotten to research and provide the necessary insight with these people on how they can protect themselves. We need to move beyond the advice of staying home and canceling non-essential events to start innovating for those who must go to their doctor’s appointment and those who struggle to wash their hands regularly. These people’s realities are not easy, not ever, and certainly not now, so where are the solutions.

As our government barely manages to provide aid for those contaminated and those who risk contamination every day to uphold the nation, the answers will not be found in the public sector. Therefore we must ask whether the private sector can genuinely care for the American population as it needs.

As an advocate for small and medium-sized enterprises, I have long studied the capabilities of the working population. As we continue to wait for officials, I believe that it is only right that capable entrepreneurs and tech teams stand up to help provide solutions for the American population and continue in a way that allows for the technologies created today to prevent the next pandemic from advancing tomorrow. I recognize this request as possible as we have already seen products be released that help maintain the lives of high-risk populations.

For those with limited mobility and those who can not risk contamination through social contact, delivery apps are available to provide for basic and essential needs. There are also Task Experts who work through a two-sided marketplace that connects Task Seekers (that needing assistance) with Task Providers (those ready to help). Allowing people to outsource small jobs to nearby community members, this promotes connection, independence, and economic flow. Additionally, the sharing economy holds the potential to fill in significant gaps in access to care. For example, the minimalist movement benefits those in and out of the high-risk group as it relies on the help of local workers, thus stimulating the economy, reducing costs, and avoiding long travel and possible contamination. Additionally, the transportation sector can implement a transportation movement by taking advantage of the available vehicles that are suitable for those who need safe, contamination-free, handicap accessible transportation.

As we have already seen, businesses take precautions to help these groups without the aid of Washington or the Trump administration; I encourage us to look to the examples that grocery stores have shown us. By setting aside senior hours at the grocery stores and managing distance requirements, they have proven that this new reality is possible. We must accept it for what it is and progress from there. Entrepreneurship moves fast. The ship in the word represents opportunity. Let’s capture this moment in time, this opportunity. By doing what we are capable of creating, we can create a new reality that is made for and involves everyone’s needs. It seems about time to get started.

Confronting the Crisis: Priorities for the Global Economy

Confronting the Crisis: Priorities for the Global Economy

Confronting the Crisis: Priorities for the Global Economy

Confronting the Crisis: Priorities for the Global Economy

Introduction: A Crisis Like No Other

I want to begin by wishing my personal best to everyone—for you and your families’ health and safety during these difficult times.

Today we are confronted with a crisis like no other. Covid-19 has disrupted our social and economic order at lightning speed and on a scale that we have not seen in living memory. The virus is causing tragic loss of life, and the lockdown needed to fight it has affected billions of people. What was normal just a few weeks ago—going to school, going to work, being with family and friends—is now a huge risk.

I have no doubt that we will overcome this challenge. Our doctors and nurses are fighting it around the clock, often risking their lives to save the lives of others. Our scientists will come up with solutions to break COVID-19’s grip. Between now and then, we must marshal the determination of all—individuals, governments, businesses, community leaders, international organizations—to act decisively and act together, to protect lives and livelihoods. These are the times for which the IMF was created—we are here to deploy the strength of the global community, so we can help shield the most vulnerable people and revitalize the economy.

The actions we take now will determine the speed and strength of our recovery. That will be the focus of the IMF’s 189 member countries when we meet in our virtual Spring Meetings next week.

It is what I will concentrate on today.

Where We Stand: the Status of the Global Economy

First, let’s look at where we stand. We are still faced with extraordinary uncertainty about the depth and duration of this crisis.

It is already clear, however, that global growth will turn sharply negative in 2020, as you will see in our World Economic Outlook next week. In fact, we anticipate the worst economic fallout since the Great Depression.

Just three months ago, we expected positive per capita income growth in over 160 of our member countries in 2020. Today, that number has been turned on its head: we now project that over 170 countries will experience negative per capita income growth this year.

The bleak outlook applies to advanced and developing economies alike. This crisis knows no boundaries. Everybody hurts.

Given the necessary containment measures to slow the spread of the virus, the world economy is taking a substantial hit. This is especially true for retail, hospitality, transport, and tourism. In most countries, the majority of workers are either self-employed or employed by small and medium-sized enterprises. These businesses and workers are especially exposed.

And just as the health crisis hits vulnerable people hardest, the economic crisis is expected to hit vulnerable countries hardest.

Emerging markets and low-income nations—across Africa, Latin America, and much of Asia—are at high risk. With weaker health systems to begin with, many face the dreadful challenge of fighting the virus in densely populated cities and poverty-stricken slums—where social distancing is hardly an option. With fewer resources to begin with, they are dangerously exposed to the ongoing demand and supply shocks, drastic tightening in financial conditions, and some may face an unsustainable debt burden.

They are also exposed to massive external pressure.

In the last two months, portfolio outflows from emerging markets were about $100 billion—more than three times larger than for the same period of the global financial crisis. Commodity exporters are taking a double blow from the collapse in commodity prices. And remittances—the lifeblood of so many poor people—are expected to dwindle.

We estimate the gross external financing needs for emerging market and developing countries to be in the trillions of dollars, and they can cover only a portion of that on their own, leaving residual gaps in the hundreds of billions of dollars. They urgently need help.

The encouraging news is that all governments have sprung into action and, indeed, there has been significant coordination. Our Fiscal Monitor next week will show that countries around the world have taken fiscal actions amounting to about $8 trillion. In addition, there have been massive monetary measures from the G20 and others.

Many of the poorer nations are also taking bold fiscal and monetary action, even as they grapple with this fundamental shock to their systems—and with far less firepower than their rich-country counterparts.

So this is a snapshot of where the global economy stands today.

There is no question that 2020 will be exceptionally difficult. If the pandemic fades in the second half of the year—thus allowing a gradual lifting of containment measures and reopening of the economy—our baseline assumption is for a partial recovery in 2021. But again, I stress there is tremendous uncertainty around the outlook: it could get worse depending on many variable factors, including the duration of the pandemic.

And crucially, everything depends on the policy actions we take now.

What Needs to be Done: a 4-Point Plan

My next point is about building the bridge to recovery. We see four priorities:

  • First, continue with essential containment measures and support for health systems. Some say there is a trade-off between saving lives and saving livelihoods. I say it is a false dilemma. Given this is a pandemic crisis, defeating the virus and defending people’s health are necessary for economic recovery. So the message is clear: prioritize health spending for testing and medical equipment; pay doctors and nurses; make sure hospitals and makeshift clinics can function. For many countries—particularly in the emerging and developing world—this means carefully reallocating limited public resources. It also means increasing the flow of resources to these countries. That includes the flow of vital goods: we must minimize disruptions to supply chains and, with immediate effect, refrain from export controls on medical supplies and food.
  • Second, shield affected people and firms with large, timely, targeted fiscal and financial sector measures. This varies according to country circumstances, but it includes tax deferrals, wage subsidies and cash transfers to the most vulnerable; extending unemployment insurance and social assistance; and temporarily adjusting credit guarantees and loan terms. Some of these measures have been taken in the first wave of policy support. Many countries are already working on a second wave. Lifelines for households and businesses are imperative. We need to prevent liquidity pressures from turning into solvency problems and avoid a scarring of the economy that would make the recovery so much more difficult.
  • Third, reduce stress to the financial system and avoid contagion. Our upcoming Global Financial Stability Report will analyze the range of vulnerabilities in the financial sector. Banks have built up more capital and liquidity over the past decade, and their resilience will be tested in this rapidly changing environment. The financial system is facing significant pressures, and monetary stimulus and liquidity facilities play an indispensable role. Interest rates have been lowered in many countries. Major central banks have activated swap lines and created new ones to reduce financial market stress. Enhancing liquidity for a broader range of emerging economies would provide further relief. Importantly, it would also lift confidence.
  • Fourth, even as we move through this containment phase, we must plan for recovery. Again, we must minimize the potential scarring effects of the crisis through policy action now. This requires careful consideration of when to gradually ease restrictions, based on clear evidence that the epidemic is retreating. As measures to stabilize the economy take hold and business starts to normalize, we will need to move swiftly to boost demand. Coordinated fiscal stimulus will be essential. Where inflation remains low and well-anchored, monetary policy should remain accommodative. Those with greater resources and policy space will need to do more; others, with limited resources will need more support.

The IMF: All Hands on Deck

This leads me to the role of the IMF.

We are working 24/7 to support our member countries—with policy advice, technical assistance and financial resources:

— We have $1 trillion in lending capacity and are placing it at the service of our membership.

— We are responding to an unprecedented number of calls for emergency financing—from over 90 countries so far. Our Executive Board has just agreed to double access to our emergency facilities, which will allow us to meet the expected demand of about $100 billion in financing. Lending programs have already been approved at record speed—including for the Kyrgyz Republic, Rwanda, Madagascar, and Togo—with many more to come.

— We are reviewing our tool kit to see how we might better use precautionary credit lines to encourage additional liquidity support, establish a short-term liquidity line, and help meet countries’ financing needs via other options—including the use of SDRs. And where we might be unable to lend because a country’s debt is unsustainable, we will look for solutions that can unlock critical financing.

— We have revamped our Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust to provide immediate debt relief to low-income countries affected by the crisis, thereby creating space for spending on urgent health needs rather than debt repayment. We are now working with donors to increase the CCRT to $1.4 billion to extend the duration of the debt relief.

— And together with the World Bank, we are calling for a standstill of debt service to official bilateral creditors for the world’s poorest countries.

I am proud of the staff of the IMF for stepping up in this crisis. And I look forward to the discussions during the Spring Meetings next week on what more we can do.

Conclusion: A Test of Our Humanity

Let me conclude with a line from Victor Hugo who once said: “Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers”.

It is this common threat that brings us all together, to harness the greatest strengths of our humanity—solidarity, courage, creativity, and compassion. We don’t know yet how our economies and way of life will change, but we do know we will come out of this crisis more resilient.

Thank you very much.

Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director

Impact of The Coronavirus (COVID 19) On The African Economy

Impact of The Coronavirus (COVID 19) On The African Economy

Impact of The Coronavirus (COVID 19) On The African Economy

Thursday April, 9, 2020 by The African Union

Impact of The Coronavirus (COVID 19) On The African Economy

Thursday April, 9, 2020 by The African Union

After the first infections in China at the end of 2019, the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has continued to spread across the world. No continent has been able to escape this virus, which has recorded average mor-tality of around 2.3% (According to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention). To date, there have been nearly 54,207 deaths, with more than 1,030,324 people infected and 219,896 recoveries across 204 countries and territories around the world and 2 international conveyances: the Diamond Princess Cruise ship harbored in Yokohama, Japan, and the Holland America’s MS Zaandam cruise ship, worldwide, thus portray-ing the severity of the virus globally (WHO Situational Report 3 April 2020, 10:00 am GMT).
 
Declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020, COVID-19 has become a global emergency, given its impact on the entire world population and the economy. According to scenario simulations of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global growth could fall by 0.5 for the year 2020. Several other sources are also predicting a fall in global growth due to the direct effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. The global economy may enter a recession at least in the first half of the year 2020, when adding the direct and indirect effects of the crisis (e.g. supply and demand shocks, commodity slump, fall in tourism arrivals, etc.). However, as the pandemic progresses slowly on the African continent, studies by international organizations have less addressed the economic impact on individual African countries. Indeed, Africa is not immunized from Covid19. As of today, according to Covid19 Surveillance Update: 3 April 2020 9:00a.m of Africa CDC, the spread of the virus has reached 50 African Union Member States: 7,028 cases, 561 recoveries and 284 deaths; and is showing no signs of slowing down. Africa, because of its openness to international trade and migration, is not immune to the harmful effects of COVID-19, which are of two kinds: endogenous and exogenous (Read More).
A Tribute to Professor David Smallbone

A Tribute to Professor David Smallbone

A Tribute to Professor David Smallbone

Thursday, April 9, 2020

A Tribute to Professor David Smallbone

Thursday, April 9, 2020

A Tribute to Professor David Smallbone

Obituary; Professor David Smallbone

We are sad to announce that Professor David Smallbone passed away recently. He had a distinguished career in the field of entrepreneurship and small firms. David was an engaging and driven individual who marked his career with a number of significant achievements in his life journey and built up an inestimable portfolio of work throughout his career. David’s entry into academia was quite unconventional. Originally a geography school teacher, he entered higher education in the mid-1970s as a tutor for the Open University and lecturer at Middlesex Polytechnic, with a research interest in small firms in local and regional economic development.  David founded the Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development at Middlesex University (then Middlesex Polytechnic) with David North, and built up a strong reputation for research and consultancy, particularly in relation to policy intervention. It was during this time, that we both met David, as he received a grant as part of the ESRC’s Small Firms Initiative co-ordinated by David Storey, for a longitudinal study of small manufacturing firms examining survivors and non-survivors.  Such studies are rare in the research field and it is regarded as novel even by today’s standards.  In 2004, David moved to the Small Business Research Centre, Kingston University, adding significant weight to an already influential research team, providing the opportunity for him to accelerate his research activity and influence.

David’s expertise spanned a range of areas including business growth, innovation, ethnic minority enterprise, transition and developing economies but he was particularly interested in public policy.  He worked with a variety of academics, practitioners and policy makers, initially in the UK and then globally and in partnership with institutions across all continents, as David built up a brilliant network of colleagues and friends. He was for example, a team member of several OECD delegations which produced country reports on SMEs and SME policy for Poland 2010, Mexico 2013 and Italy 2014. These involved lengthy visits and interactions with national, regional and local policy makers as well as financial institutions and SMEs. He undertook research in the former Soviet Republics and transition economies from the early 1990s, at a time when it was neither fashionable or easy to pursue. This did not deter David. He built up long-lasting international relations with partners, for example, in Russia, Poland, Estonia, the Baltic States, China, Kenya, South Africa, the USA and Australasia. David also promulgated and managed a number of large-scale European projects, particularly with partners through the European Network for Social and Economic Research, most recently for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions leading an international team who analysed born-global manufacturing SMEs, employing an unusual research design that traced partners in global value chains and the role of SMEs.

David was very much a people-person and relished engaging with others, irrespective of position.  With colleagues, David regularly presented papers at ISBE’s (formerly ISBA and UKEMRA) annual research and policy conferences and contributed to the growth of the organisation through his executive positions, chairing of workshops, committees and doctoral workshops. From the mid-1990s his energy was then transferred to the European and international stage, collaborating with colleagues in their home countries. Hence, David helped to shape many careers, too numerous to mention by name but suffice to say that without his advice, counsel and drive to co-publish, many academics may have taken a different career path. He mentored younger researchers on local and international projects as well as undertook formal duties supervising and examining doctorates, thus influencing and encouraging many academics who have become today’s leading researchers.

As well as his myriad publications, David’s recognition and expertise is reflected in his numerous awards and honours. He was Visiting Professor of Entrepreneurship at the China University of Geosciences in Wuhan, Associate Editor of the Journal of Small Business Management, member of the Editorial Board of the International Small Business Journal, President (2005-07) and Fellow of the European Council for Small Firms and Entrepreneurship, President of the International Council for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (2010-11) and Wilfred White Fellow of ICSB. David was an accomplished traveller, reaching the four corners of the world, for example in 2008, spending three months at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, as a Visiting Erskine Scholar. In 2005 David was proud to receive an Honorary Doctorate from the University of Lodz, in recognition of his contribution to the study of entrepreneurship in transition economies.  David’s travelling would have exhausted even the fittest individual but his zest for life and intellectual curiosity continued to take him overseas, most recently to Brazil in 2019 and India, for a Global Challenges Research Fund project, just a few weeks before he died.

Those who have had the privilege to work with David, as we both have, will have been touched by his dedication and passion on his subject, always tinged with a sense of humour and humanity. According to one friend, as President of ICSB David was never very outspoken but when he did speak everyone would listen, even the Americans! David was a keen Arsenal fan, holding a season ticket and pointed out that one of the advantages of having a mobility problem was that his seat was ‘close the action’. His birthday parties at his home in St Albans are now legendary, with a traditional jazz band providing entertainment and where on occasion David managed a dance with his wife. Most recently, David’s ill-health was beginning to hamper his mobility but his indefatigable spirit led him to continue to work and with support from his wife and family, his helper and close colleagues, he took on new projects and produced numerous research outputs adding to his extensive life’s work.  He insisted on going into the office to meet staff and students right to the end. Resolutely cheerful, never complaining and always planning the next project. Even at the end, David was working on an edited book with colleagues across the globe. It was this display of courage, tenacity and dedication that brought an incredible display of respect amongst his peers; over a hundred sending in messages of condolences on hearing of his passing. David will be dearly missed by the academic community and policy makers across the globe.  He leaves behind his loving wife, Margaret and family.

David John Smallbone 13th, 1946 – 19th March 2020

Robert Blackburn and David Storey